![]() In philosophy, for instance, a common approach is to use or react to one particular theory rather than situating the research in the broader field. 1 x Most disciplines within the humanities, such as philosophy or literary studies, are also not very explicit about the academic embedding of the research. If we compare legal scholarship with related disciplines, the social sciences seem to pay more explicit attention to such issues. This is not to say that legal scholars ignore these issues while conducting research but rather that they leave them largely implicit in their writings (Hutchinson & Duncan 2012, p. What is less clear is how the researchers in question relate to different points of view in their academic field and how they evaluate the previous research done in that field. Within legal scholarship, the academic embedding of a research project often takes the form of a summary of the current state of positive law, combining reference to primary sources such as legislation and court cases with reference to handbooks and recent journal articles. However, to assess the quality of legal research as a contribution to the advancement of knowledge, i.e., as science, it is crucial to know how it relates to the approaches and theories in the academic field. Many legal scholars also justify their research topics by referring to new developments in practice, displaying more interest in the societal relevance than in the academic relevance of their work. ![]() Legal scholars enjoy discussing current affairs and recent cases and take particular pride in seeing their work cited in a judgment or in parliamentary debate. Virtue ethics focuses on cultivating character traits such as courage, honesty, and justice which will lead to more ethical actions.Legal doctrinal scholarship is not a discipline that can be said to engage in l’art pour l’art. Utilitarianism holds that the morally correct action is the one that produces the most happiness or good consequences overall, while deontology holds that an action is morally correct if it does not violate any moral duty or obligation. Some common examples include utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. There are many different types of normative ethical theories, each with its strengths and weaknesses. ![]() They help us determine what is right and wrong, and can guide us in making decisions about what to do in difficult situations. Normative ethics are important because they provide a framework for how we ought to behave in various situations. For example, the principle of beneficence tells us that we should do things that will promote the good of others, while the principle of non-maleficence tells us to avoid doing things that will cause harm. These principles can be derived from our understanding of what is good or bad, right or wrong. We can define normative ethics as a system of moral principles that tell us what we ought to do in various situations. ISRO CS Syllabus for Scientist/Engineer Exam.ISRO CS Original Papers and Official Keys.GATE CS Original Papers and Official Keys.DevOps Engineering - Planning to Production.Python Backend Development with Django(Live). ![]() Android App Development with Kotlin(Live).Full Stack Development with React & Node JS(Live).Java Programming - Beginner to Advanced.Data Structure & Algorithm-Self Paced(C++/JAVA).Data Structures & Algorithms in JavaScript.Data Structure & Algorithm Classes (Live). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |